The following information
is published as Open Sources, it does not constitute any
endorsement from ISRIA. If titles are sometimes modified for better
understanding, the contents are reproduced as delivered by the official
institution that first published it. To know the origin,
click on 'view original source' at the end of the page.
Share / Bookmark this Article
Ministerials discussed new Strategic Concept, missile defence
NATO Ministers of Defence and of Foreign Affairs have started their deliberations today to prepare the agenda for their Heads of State and Government that will meet at the upcoming NATO Summit in Lisbon, on 19 and 20 November, to set the course for the Alliance in the next decade and reform the organization.
The agenda of the meetings in Brussels will focus on NATO’s new Strategic Concept, missile defence and reform. In his opening remarks, NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said that “starting
today, and over the course of the next few weeks, we will shape
and agree the new Strategic Concept.”
He stressed that the new Strategic Concept will guide the Alliance
through the next decade. “It is critical that we get it right. NATO’s core mission, to protect the 900 million citizens of NATO countries from attack, must never change – but it must be modern defence, against modern threats,” the
Secretary General said.
Moving on to the ministerial discussions on missile defence,
the Secretary General highlighted that “we must also decide if we want NATO to be able to defend all of Europe against the threat of missile attack” and
that he believed the time was ripe to take this decision.
“The threat is clear. The capability exists. And the costs are manageable. I believe we can and should make missile defence for Europe a NATO capability,” Mr
Fogh Rasmussen said.
On NATO reform, the Secretary General stated that “the Alliance is already good
value for money. By standing together, we get more security than we ever could
by going it alone. But we must do better.”
He said that NATO’s command structure and agencies were in need of reform and that Allies should buy and operate more equipment together that they could not afford individually. “Less infrastructure; leaner and more effective headquarters; more deployable forces; coherent cuts in national defense budgets, so we retain what we need as an Alliance. A reform agenda to guide NATO’s transformation, through and beyond this period of austerity,” he
view original source
© Copyright 2011 - ISRIA -
all rights reserved - Established 2004